September 26, 2011, 12:04 PM

Everything You Need to Know for the State Dept Meetings

Malinda Frevert

News, TransCanada Pipeline, State Department

As part of the decision making process to grant or deny a permit for the TransCanada pipeline, the US State Department is holding meetings in Nebraska to get input from citizens, experts, and landowners. They are asking for comments on their Final Environmental Impact Statement and, more generally, whether you think the pipeline is in our state and national interest. 

This is the moment where we can stop the pipeline in its tracks. These meetings will be our opportunity to show the State Department and, by extension, President Obama that the TransCanada Keystone XL pipeline must be stopped to protect our land and water. 

**Please wear Husker red to the State Dept. meetings. This will show our unity but also our support for Coach Osborne who recently kicked TransCanada ads out of Memorial Stadium.**

Meeting times and dates

Lincoln
Tuesday, Sept. 27
Pershing Center, 226 Centennial Mall South
Meeting times: 12-3:30pm AND 4-8pm (there will be a 30 minute break)

Rally time: 11am--Meet in front of the Pershing Center, bring handmade signs. We will hand out armbands, action guides, yard signs, and more.

After party: 8pm, Duggans Pub, 440 South 11th Street (bands, pipeline materials and more!)  

Atkinson
Thursday, Sept. 29
West Holt High School, 100 N. Main Street
Meeting time: 4:30-10pm

Rally time: 3:30pm--Meet near the bleachers on the left hand side as you drive in. Bring handmade signs. We will hand out armbands, action guides, yard signs, and more.

If you're going to attend one (or both) of the meetings please RSVP to us here. We want to have a tentative head count so that we can bring enough t-shirts, buttons, bumper stickers, and arm bands for everyone!

You still MUST sign-in at the State Dept. meeting if you want to give testimony.

What to expect at the State Dept. meetings

Bold will have pre-rallies in both locations one hour before the meetings begin. We will have materials like bumper stickers, t-shirts, yard signs and arm bands there for folks to pick up. The yard signs and handmade signs can not go into the meeting, so we will store them in a van and once the meeting is over, we will be there to hand them out.

If you want to testify/speak: there is a sign-up process ahead of time. You will arrive at the location and sign-up on a sheet inside the meeting location if you want to talk. You will have 3 minutes to present your information.

We suggest you stick to one topic and try to answer the question, "Is this pipeline in our nation's interest?" Anyone can speak--you can be a pipeline expert, scientist, grandmom, nature lover, ethanol producer, student, farmer, rancher, or landowner, basically anyone who cares about our land and water.

We also suggest you start your testimony out by giving a 15 second description about who you are. For example, "My name is Sean, and I teach in Lincoln. My family homesteaded in the Sandhills and still ranches out in Atkinson. I am opposed to the pipeline because...."

If you want to have your comments on the pipeline on the record but not speak at the hearings, email your comments to info@boldnebraska.org. We will hand deliver the comments on the day of the hearings to the State Department staff.

You do not have to stay for the entire meeting. You can come and sign-up, speak, and leave. Or you can stay for the entire time to listen and show your support.

Want to do some research before you attend the meetings? Check out our Pipeline Background Resources page.

Quick tips to email your friends

Nebraskans have a unique opportunity to tell the State Department directly why you want to stop or re-route the pipeline.

1) Get there as early as possible and sign in. If you do not want to speak, still get there early and hold a place for one of our folks.

2) If they let you sign in multiple people, bring a list of your friends/family who you think also want to speak so you can sign them in, too. (We do not know if they will let you, but we will be prepared since we pipeline proponents are paying people.)

3) Wear a red t-shirt and an armband. We will hand out armbands on site of the meeting.

4) Participate in our rally that begins one hour before each meeting.

5) Text 402-705-3622 with any problems or anything fishy you see happening.

Other events around the State Dept. meetings

We add new pipeline events all the time.  Check out our Event Page for activities you can attend to meet other Nebraskans working on this issue.

Everything from the movie "The Pipe" to us hosting a booth at "VegFest."

If you want to volunteer with us at the events, just email info@boldnebraska.org.

For Press

Please email news@boldnebraska.org for a list of spokespeople who will be more than happy to be interviewed. 

You can also call Jane Kleeb, our Executive Director, at 402-705-3622.

We can point you to hotels and good restaurants if you are coming in from out of state (or country!), just let us know what you need.

Lastly, we have a page of resources for you that includes photos, video, b-roll, and important research.

Comments

September 28th 2011

James Ira Liermann - If this is really about jobs, then route the damn thing a few 100 miles to the east over/through clay soil, away from the Sandhills and Ogalalla Aquifer. That would create extra work and I'm sure the company could afford it. When the ethanol plant went up in Atkinson, that company did not want to hire locals. Most of the workers were guys with experience in the oil and refinery industry from Louisiana and Texas and Mexico. I would guess that Keystone will do the same thing. Not that we really need the jobs here; Nebraska has one of the lowest unemployment rates in the nation.

October 3rd 2011

Malinda Frevert - Columbanus, first of all, the sources you are citing are highly suspect. Dr. Goecke has expressed concerns in the past about building this pipeline in the Sandhills but appears to be bending to TransCanada's beck and call. The 2nd piece you have is a TransCanada document--forgive us if we don't trust a word they say, they certainly have earned none of our trust. And the latter is an industry piece from TransCanada and Conocco Phillips. They did not consult with highly regarded experts at UNL like Dr. Wayne Woldt or Dr. Stansbury. The latter of whom, by the way, wrote an independent study that shows just how damaging leaks from the Keystone XL could be. The aquifer is the lifeblood of this state, supporting agriculture and human life. To run a pipeline right through the Sandhills, an incredibly ecologically sensitive area, is foolhardy and even Senators Nelson and Johanns agree. I suggest you keep digging into TransCanada's treatment of landowners and the sensitivity of the Sandhills, speak to real experts not on TransCanada's payroll.

October 3rd 2011

columbanus - Why are ya'll so focused on the aquifer. There is already a pipeline going over the aquifer. Not to mention the oil consistency becoming extremely viscous upon cooling (the pipeline is heated). After having looked into the data I have come to the conclusion that TransCanada and the State department have been far more truthful and transparent than BoldNE. Decisions are being made by getting people emotionally riled up without real facts. Decisions need to be made logically in order to minimize unintended consequences. See https://www.dmr.nd.gov/pipeline/ for detailed information regarding pipelines and this one in particular. There are also articles from scientists http://journalstar.com/news/opinion/editorial/columnists/article_40586032-0597-5375-815a-8f91284a5fbf.html, http://www.transcanada.com/5862.html, and http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=keystone+xl+...construction+technique&source=web&cd=1&ved=0CCcQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.keystonepipeline-xl.state.gov%2Fclientsite%2Fkeystonexl.nsf%2FFEISAppendix_H_Construction-Techniques-in-the-Sand-Hills-Region.pdf%3FOpenFileResource&ei=3_2ETvL-DYf50gH15a3RDw&usg=AFQjCNH1QB3HT1hRuTip7qwiWQMj3CE9hw. After much digging I have found that opponents of the pipeline are woefully uninformed and when faced with real facts fail to hold their position. This whole thing stinks of the radioactive waste facility that was to be built, then was reneged on by the state costing $150 million in lawsuits. Again, misinformation about the facility (callin it a "nuke dumpsite" when in fact it was a low-energy site mainly so medical waste from things like CAT scans could degrade which takes about 6 months for P32 and others are so low energy that they are not a health factor) drove the general public against the facility and ultimately cost the state dearly by wasting taxpayer money. The situation here looks remarkably similar, but larger in scope. Will NE make the same mistake twice?

(Will NOT be Published)