- Top oil industry officials and analysts have said that Keystone XL is critically important to expansion of the tar sands: Canada is currently producing a little over 2 million barrels a day of tar sands oil but they would like to nearly triple that by 2030 (see CAPP, pg. 40). The oil industry and Canadian officials have made it no secret that Keystone XL is critical for this expansion to proceed. Even Governor Chris Christie weighed in recently saying that Keystone XL, “[B]y limiting the ability of increased production from the Canadian oil sands to get to market, it stunts production. It risks stunting growth as well.”
- The high average oil prices assumed in the State Department review’s reference scenario are no more and oil prices are expected to stay low for some time: Current low oil prices mean a significant shift in the ability of the tar sands industry to be profitable in the absence of cheap pipeline infrastructure. The State Department’s Final Environmental Impact Statement acknowledges that, in a scenario where oil falls below $75 per barrel, “oil sands production is expected to be most sensitive to increased transport costs,” and that under these circumstances, Keystone XL “could have a substantial impact on oil sands production levels,” and therefore on the climate (See State’s FEIS, Market Analysis, 188.8.131.52). The Energy Information Administration has slashed its estimates for oil prices and Futures markets predict oil prices will be lower than $75/barrel oil through 2022.
- Other pipelines that were planned to supplement, not replace, Keystone XL are not moving forward: In order to reach their production goals, the industry will need not only Keystone XL but other pipelines to Canada’s west (Gateway and Kinder Morgan) and east (Energy East) coasts as well as expanding current pipelines (Alberta Clipper). While the State Department concedes that the Gateway pipeline will likely not be approved due to local opposition, other pipelines are facing similar, significant opposition.
- Rail is not turning out to be the viable alternative that the State Department assumed it would be: Much of the State Department review is dedicated to showing that rail would replace Keystone XL. The State Department relied on data that predicted that, by the end of 2013, 200,000 barrels/day of tar sands oil would be transported by rail to the Gulf. Due to the high cost of rail and safety concerns, less than 50,000 barrels/day are actually reaching the Gulf today. According to industry statistics, rail is considerably more expensive than the pipeline would be. A train terminal in Alberta–which was featured as evidence of a tar-sands-by-rail future–has now gone into bankruptcy.
- Growth in the tar sands has been adjusted down since the State Department analysis was released: In June of last year, the Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers downgraded their expectations for growth by over 400,000 bpd. This is because new projects are slowing in the tar sands. The oil industry explains this has mainly been due to a combination of rising production costs and lack of access to markets (i.e. lack of new pipeline infrastructure). Citingpipeline constraints, Norway’s StatOil, France’s Total, and Shell have shelved over 400,000 bpd of big tar sands expansion projects in the last year, and this was before oil prices fell. Now other large projects have been shelved or are starting to sputter due to a perfect storm of rising costs, low oil prices, and pipeline bottlenecks, with over $30 billion in lost revenues to date, much of that loss attributable to delays driven by citizen protest. This trend is accelerating – in the last few weeks alone, over half a million bpd of additional tar sands expansion projects were deferred.
January 15, 2015
To: Reporters, Columnists, and Editorial Boards
From: Natural Resources Defense Council, Sierra Club, 350.org, Oil Change International, Bold Nebraska, Center for Biological Diversity, Rainforest Action Network, National Wildlife Federation, Indigenous Environmental Network, and Wica Agli
Re: The Facts about Keystone XL’s Climate Impact
As the Senate debates amendments to legislation that would force approval of the controversial Keystone XL tar sands pipeline, which President Obama has already committed to veto, it has become conventional wisdom among many observers and pundits that the debate over the pipeline is now purely symbolic. The impacts of the proposed pipeline are overblown by both sides, they argue, with Republicans inflating the number of jobs the pipeline would create on one side and Democrats overplaying its potential environmental impact on the other.
The idea that Keystone XL’s impact on the climate would be negligible is based on the assertion made in the State Department’s flawed environmental analysis from early last year, that Canadian tar sands will come out of the ground regardless of whether or not this project goes forward. But the facts tell a different story. Recent market analysis shows that, as Canadian government and industry officials have been saying for years, building Keystone XL is a necessary part of unlocking tar sands expansion and the carbon emissions they would release, now more than ever.
Together these points make it crystal clear that tar sands expansion is far from inevitable, and that the construction of Keystone XL would be throwing a lifeline to an industry already struggling in the current market. According to new research published last week in the journal Nature, in order to stay within the two degree Celsius warming scenario the international community has committed to in order to combat the climate crisis, nearly all of Canada’s tar sands will need to stay in the ground. Given these findings, and the mounting evidence that Keystone XL is the linchpin for greater exploitation of the tar sands, it is clear that the debate over Keystone XL’s environmental impact is far from symbolic.
For more information, contact:
Jane Kleeb of Bold Alliance Responds to Silence From TransCanada on Final Investment Decision for Keystone XL Project
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE February 15, 2018 Jane Kleeb of Bold Alliance Responds to Silence From TransCanada on Final Investment Decision for Keystone XL Project Lincoln, NE — Bold Alliance president Jane Kleeb issued the following statement in response to silence from TransCanada today towards its investors, regarding a final investment decision on whether or not […]Read Post
In Advance of TransCanada Earnings Call, Bold and Allied Groups Release Investor Briefing on Keystone XL Obstacles
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE February 15, 2018 Contact Mark Hefflinger, Bold Alliance, firstname.lastname@example.org Yianni Varonis, Greenpeace USA, 330-806-3599, email@example.com In Advance of TransCanada Earnings Call, Bold and Allied Groups Release Investor Briefing on Keystone XL Obstacles Washington, D.C. – Today, Bold Nebraska along with allied groups Greenpeace USA, Greenpeace UK, Oil Change International (OCI), the National […]Read Post
We’ve just learned that Troy Thompson, son of Randy “Stand With Randy” Thompson and part of a Pipeline Fighter family since the beginning in Nebraska, was struck by a car on Sunday while walking his dog in Lincoln, and is currently in the hospital in critical condition at Bryan West Campus. Thoughts and prayers from […]Read Post
If you’re a NEAT member and TransCanada calls, you just say, “I’m with NEAT, call Dave Domina.” We are hearing reports that this week TransCanada has begun contacting landowners on the proposed Keystone XL “Mainline Alternative” route in Nebraska, to schedule meetings and conduct surveys on their land. The Nebraska Easement Action Team (N.E.A.T.), an […]Read Post
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: Jan. 18, 2018 Contact: Jane Kleeb, Bold Nebraska, 402-705-3622, firstname.lastname@example.org Mark Hefflinger, Bold Nebraska, email@example.com Bold Nebraska Statement on TransCanada Announcement of Shipper Commitments for Keystone XL Pipeline Nebraska Supreme Court still to hear landowners’ legal challenge to Public Service Commission approval of “Mainline Alternative” route this fall Lincoln — After TransCanada […]Read Post
(Bold Nebraska billboard in Lincoln on 10th & L St.) Did you see our billboard? Bold Nebraska has purchased a digital billboard in downtown Lincoln to call out Gov. Pete Ricketts for failing to protect Nebraska’s highest property taxpayers — farmers and ranchers — from eminent domain for private gain and TransCanada’s Keystone XL pipeline. […]Read Post
On Dec. 27, Nebraska landowners challenging TransCanada’s permit application seeking the power of eminent domain to build the Keystone XL pipeline through the state filed an appeal (embedded below) of the Nebraska Public Service Commission’s decision to approve the “Mainline Alternative” pipeline route. The filing from landowners’ attorneys with Domina Law Group triggers a process that […]Read Post
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: Dec. 19, 2017 Contact: Mark Hefflinger, firstname.lastname@example.org Landowners, Pipeline Fighters Vow to Continue Fight After Nebraska Public Service Commission Denies Motions to Reconsider Ruling on Keystone XL Permit Application Lincoln — Landowners and Pipeline Fighters vowed to continue their fight on Tuesday after the Nebraska Public Service Commission denied a series of […]Read Post
TransCanada’s Keystone 1 pipeline (constructed in 2008) spilled at least 210,000 gallons of tarsands onto a South Dakota farm on Nov. 16, 2017. Recent drone photos (courtesy Greenpeace) show the current spill clean-up effort that now includes hundreds of workers and dozens of vehicles and equipment trailers on the spill site around the clock, where […]Read Post
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: Monday, December 4, 2017 Groups Call on Trump Administration to Evaluate New Keystone XL Route Pipeline Route Approved in Nebraska Poses New Risks to Wildlife, Requires Legal Review Washington, DC — A coalition of environmental groups filed letters today urging the Trump administration to analyze the environmental impacts of the approved route […]Read Post
Click to zoom in on the map below, or open in a new window and zoom in to see if your property may be on the pipeline route (LINK: http://bit.ly/kxlmap) Are you a landowner in Nebraska (Antelope, Madison, Platte, Colfax, Butler, Seward, Saline, Jefferson) who has been contacted by TransCanada land agents for the proposed […]Read Post
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: Nov. 22, 2017 Federal Lawsuit Challenging Keystone XL Approval Will Move Forward Court Stops Trump Administration From Flouting Environmental Laws Great Falls, MT — Today, a federal judge ruled that a lawsuit brought by environmental and landowner groups over the Trump administration’s approval of the cross-border permit for the Keystone XL tar […]Read Post
LISTEN: Keystone XL Decision Day Telepresser for media: Jane Kleeb, Bold Nebraska founder Brian Jorde, attorney for Nebraska landowners (Domina Law Group) Art Tanderup, Nebraska landowner on Keystone XL route Chairman Larry Wright Jr., Ponca Tribe of Nebraska Eriel Deranger, Athabasca Chipewyan First Nation Bill McKibben, co-founder 350.org Michael Brune, Sierra Club Lorne Stockman, market analyst, […]Read Post
On Nov. 3, 2017, Canadian TV broadcaster CBC’s “The Fifth Estate” program aired a 45-minute, in-depth investigative report: “Keystone XL: The Money Pipeline” on the lobbying and dark money being directed to promote and grease the wheels for TransCanada’s proposed Keystone XL pipeline. HIGHLIGHTS Bold Nebraska’s Jane Kleeb describes our FOIA request that exposed TransCanada’s presentation to […]Read Post
THANK YOU to all the Pipeline Fighters and Water Protectors who joined the March to Give Keystone XL the Boot on Sunday, Aug. 6th in Lincoln — and everyone who made their voices heard at the four public hearings and in their written comments we delivered to the Nebraska Public Service Commission. Together with our […]Read Post
Bold, Environmental Groups File Opening Brief in Legal Challenge to Trump’s Rubber-Stamp Approval of Keystone XL
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: Feb. 12, 2018 Contact: Jane Kleeb, Bold Nebraska, 402-705-3622, email@example.com Bold Alliance, Environmental Groups File Opening Brief in Lawsuit Challenging Trump’s Rubber-Stamp Federal Approval of Keystone XL Pipeline Lawsuit challenges approval of pipeline permit by State Dept. and U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service before final route decided, with no updated environmental review […]Read Post